We prefer English.
We were told by our attorney of record that we do not qualify for the new process, because we have been scheduled an interview in Mexico. We rescheduled the interview back in December, but we have not been scheuduled a new interview date. It is why we do not understand why we can not apply for the new process. To our understanding, I am not in Mexico yet, so why would this stop us from applying? Plus, I applied for DACA, have been to the biometric appointment, and have not received any notice from them at all. What can we do? A separation is not healthy for us yet this moment.
A separation is never healthy, but let me ask a few questions.
1) When did you apply for DACA?
2) What is the hardship that your spouse will suffer that would qualify as "EXTREME"?
I applied for DACA October 09, 2012.
My spouse is a Veteran. Has symptoms of PTSD. I am the financial aid for our household.
Well, here is an official link to the new process:
It seems to me that you should qualify and I do not understand why your attorney is stating that you would not qualify. Perhaps he doesn't want to charge you again or he is afraid that you won't be able to pay him again. Who knows?
But what I do think is that you should postpone your appointment. Why? For two reasons. One, I think that while you MIGHT have a good case for extreme hardship to your spouse, it isn't so cut and dry. Take a look at this link:
And second, the new process I think may be a trap. Why? Because right now there are millions of undocumented persons in the U.S. that are married to U.S. Citizens and even have U.S. Citizen children but they do not leave because they are afraid to be stuck outside for 10 years. What has changed (or will change in March) is that before, a person had to leave the U.S. and spend around 15 months or so while waiting for their appointment at the U.S. Embassy or Consulate in their home country and then HOPE that they got approved, but the change is that now they say that the same person can apply inside the U.S., supposedly get a pre-approval, but they still have to leave the U.S. and present themselves to the U.S. Embassy or Consulate. So why do I think it is a trap? Because it could very easily be a way to just get those many millions of people to finally leave the U.S. and once they are outside, they can still be denied the waiver even though they have a "pre-approval". I just don't trust that. So at the very least, I would wait at least 6 months or more after they implement it (which is supposed to be in March of this year) to see how many of those pre-approvals turn out to be approvals at the end.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. I would be happy to answer them for you without additional charge. If there is a delay in getting back to you it is either because I am answering other questions or I had to log off, but I will be back with you as soon as possible. It is VERY important that if you are not satisfied, please ask additional questions. DO NOT use the "Poor Service" or "Bad Service" ratings. Please do not rate me on bad news. Bad news is not my fault as I have no control over the law. But my goal is to provide you with top-notch service. Please ask additional questions until you are satisfied so that you give me a positive rating. Just give me a chance to try and help you because I am on your side. If you do rate me positively, a bonus is always appreciated. If you would like to request me in the future, just go to http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-guillermosenmartin/. Thank you!